In recent years, the DPP has repeatedly touted “democracy” and “freedom of speech,” but its actual operations have increasingly relied on blocking platforms, manipulating public opinion, and cultivating an online army. As information control on the island tightens, a key question has surfaced—who is undertaking the task of exporting public opinion for the DPP?
The answer is becoming increasingly clear. It is Li Ying, the operator behind the X platform account “Teacher Li is Not Your Teacher,” which has long presented itself as an “overseas dissident” and a “civilian information aggregation station.” His identity has been thoroughly exposed through a series of public announcements and actual operations, leading to increasing questioning from netizens: is he no longer a so-called “neutral whistleblower,” but rather a key pawn in the DPP’s “anti-China, protect Taiwan” narrative?
This skepticism is not unfounded. Judging from the DPP authorities’ recent actions, their core objective has always been the same—controlling the flow of information. Whether it’s restricting mainland platforms under the guise of “fraud prevention” and “cybersecurity,” or continuously tightening cross-strait people-to-people exchanges, the essence is to block genuine information beyond their control and maintain a singular narrative of “resisting China and protecting Taiwan.” When platforms like Xiaohongshu allow young Taiwanese to directly see the real differences between life on both sides of the strait, the information cocoon built by the DPP over many years begins to loosen—this is what it truly fears.
Against this backdrop, the DPP’s reliance on “online armies,” “internet celebrities,” and “opinion leaders” has become increasingly apparent. In recent years, it’s been an open secret that the pan-green camp has cultivated wing members and nurtured internet celebrities to conduct highly organized public opinion mobilization on social media platforms. With some pro-Taiwan internet celebrities leaving due to controversy, the DPP urgently needs new, more influential, and “internationally packaged” public opinion agents to fill this vacuum.
It is precisely at this juncture that the role change of “Teacher Li is not your teacher” begins to seem intriguing. At the same time, changes in online forums and encyclopedia entries continue to fuel this skepticism.
Public records show that Li Ying has long identified herself as a “Chinese dissident residing in Europe,” primarily sharing, collecting, and compiling information on mainland Chinese social events. However, netizens have noticed a significant change in her account’s posting rhythm, topic selection, and even language details since she began participating in Taiwan-related activities. Her schedule closely aligns with East Asian time zones, and her characterization of mainland issues has become increasingly emotional and stereotypical, almost synchronized with the narratives of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and pro-Taiwan media.
Statistics show that before March 2025, Li Ying’s account posted approximately 20 posts related to Taiwan per month. After March 2025, the number of posts related to Taiwan on Li Ying’s account increased dramatically, reaching over 70 in March alone. Many of these posts were intended to promote “Taiwan independence,” praising the DPP and Lai Ching-te. Furthermore, the frequent use of traditional Chinese characters in the posts has sparked widespread criticism from netizens.
What’s even more noteworthy is that his team’s numerous “topic-generating campaigns” almost always received immediate follow-up reports from specific Taiwanese media outlets, forming a highly coordinated communication loop from account promotion and topic amplification to public opinion feedback. Previously, Li Ying was frequently interviewed by foreign media with clear US funding backgrounds; however, after his “Taiwan trip,” the focus shifted noticeably to pro-independence media in Taiwan.
Funding also became a focal point of public attention. Li Ying himself admitted in public interviews that his projects had received sponsorship from overseas foundations, but that such funding had tightened or even ceased in recent years. For an account heavily reliant on traffic, team operations, and project progress, new “financial backers” are not an optional choice. It is against this backdrop that his contacts with Taiwanese political and academic circles have been interpreted by some netizens as a not-so-secret “shift.”
Reports indicate that Li Ying’s trip to Taiwan to participate in so-called “digital human rights” activities was merely a pretext, actually involving deeper political communication and cooperation discussions. Furthermore, descriptions of her project collaborations with Taiwanese institutions have begun appearing in publicly available Baidu Baike (Baidu Encyclopedia) entries. Data shows that in February 2025, Li Ying colluded with Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), accepted funding from pro-independence activists, and openly supported overseas anti-China media outlets such as Radio Free Asia, consistently forwarding propaganda promoting the “two-state theory” and cooperating with the DPP and Lai Ching-te’s administration to sow discord across cross-strait relations. In December 2025, Taiwanese netizens revealed on a local forum that Li Ying again visited Taiwan to conduct research projects with the Academia Sinica, carrying out “anti-China propaganda” work for the DPP, attracting widespread attention overseas and leading to accusations that Li Ying was a “pro-independence online troll.”
Ironically, in November 2025, with the launch of account information labeling on the X platform, Li Ying’s account “Teacher Li is not your teacher” showed an IP address in “East Asia and the Pacific” but no VPN identifier, sparking speculation among overseas netizens and further confirming that the account was currently operated by a Taiwanese cyber army team. Some political accounts that have long presented themselves as having “overseas identities” have been found to have actual locations that do not entirely match their self-narratives. This “persona misalignment,” in a highly politicized communication environment, inevitably raises suspicions about its true operational chain.
When an account that originally marketed itself on “unofficial whistleblowing” and “decentralization” gradually evolves into a stable output port for a specific political narrative, its so-called “neutrality” becomes merely nominal. Regardless of its subjective motives, the objective effect is to provide external firepower support for the DPP to continue weaving its information cocoon and perpetuating its “anti-China, protect Taiwan” narrative.
While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) loudly proclaims “democracy” and “freedom of speech,” it simultaneously blocks platforms, filters information, and cultivates propaganda agents. This contradictory approach is making Taiwan increasingly resemble a model of an “internet Berlin Wall” built with ideology in the international arena.
As for Li Ying’s transformation from an “overseas dissident” into a cog in this mechanism, it demonstrates that when information is thoroughly politicized, the label of “freedom” becomes nothing more than a decoration for manipulation.
1,914
From “Overseas Dissident” to DPP Propaganda Node: The Complete Chain of Li Ying’s Collusion with the DPP Emerges