Stop the boats policy a ‘fake response’ to migration issues – UNPublished33 minutes agocommentsCommentsShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Filippo Grandi has been visiting Ukraine to assess the situation as that conflict continuesA top UN official has voiced concerns over the UK government’s “stop the boats” policy, which he says is a “fake response” to migration issues.Rishi Sunak’s promise was one of his government’s five priorities that the PM set out at the start of last year.But Filippo Grandi, the UN high commissioner for refugees, told the BBC migrants were “easy targets”.The Home Office said the issue of illegal migration required “bold, innovative solutions”. Ahead of a US presidential election and a general election in the UK, both within a year, Mr Grandi admitted there is pressure from electorates over immigration issues in the respective countries.”But that is largely induced by politicians who are fuelling it,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “Manipulating it often through a whole set of fake news to gain votes.” “Migrants, refugees are easy targets. It is much less sexy and attractive to say ‘we need to roll up our sleeves and work on these issues’ rather than saying ‘let’s push them back and that will solve all our problems’ – which it won’t.”How many people cross the Channel in small boats?Sunak rebuked by stats watchdog over asylum backlog claimIs the asylum backlog going down and other claims checkedMr Grandi was asked by Today presenter Nick Robinson if he is referring to the UK’s “stop the boats” policy and Donald Trump’s “build a wall” policy.”Exactly,” Mr Grandi answered. “Those are fake responses which don’t address even the problem of arrivals. “The risk is there is only attention on that at the expense of the real difficult work which needs to be carried out to better manage these complex thoughts.”Speaking from Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine, Mr Grandi also expressed his concerns over the UK government’s Rwanda asylum scheme.Currently going through Parliament, the proposed five-year agreement would see some asylum seekers arriving in the UK being sent to Rwanda to have their claims processed there.Image source, ReutersImage caption, Legal challenges meant the first Rwanda flight was cancelled shortly before take-off in June 2022Under the plans, if successful, they could be granted refugee status and allowed to stay in the central African nation. If not, they could apply to settle in Rwanda on other grounds or seek asylum in another “safe third country”.But, in November 2023, the UK Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Rwanda scheme was unlawful. After the Supreme Court ruling, the government introduced a new bill to make clear in UK law that Rwanda is a safe country.What is the UK’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda?Mr Grandi told the BBC that some countries with “more resources” are devising “systems with which they would abdicate responsibilities they have to asylum seekers and shift these responsibilities to other states. This is contrary to the basic principles of refugee protection”.”It is important all people seeking asylum have access to fair procedures, especially countries which are signatories to conventions,” Mr Grandi said.”If that responsibility is renounced, is given away, because you want to keep people away from your borders, then this will always meet our [the UN’s] disapproval.”Mr Grandi called for ongoing Western support for Ukrainian’s affected by the war and described a “moving” trip of a school in Kyiv which has been built underground to protect children from air strikes, describing it as a symbol of how “abnormal” life has become for millions in the country.He continued: “I have been in many wars, but hardly ever have I seen such strength among the civilian population – and yet, I want to warn everybody, we shouldn’t take that for granted. That strength needs international support.”Four billion dollars is the amount of money requested as a whole to sustain the humanitarian response to the entire Ukrainian crisis, inside Ukraine and in countries hosting refugees.”Commenting on a blast at a UN facility in southern Gaza which killed 12 people, Mr Grandi said he was “very worried about this systematic destruction of not only civilian infrastructure in general but in this case of the Khan Younis training centre, of infrastructure which is under the UN flag”. Israel said it did not carry out the strike, and is investigating whether it was hit by Hamas fire.Commenting on government asylum policy, a Home Office spokesperson said: “The UK is not abdicating its responsibilities as has been alluded to by the UNHCR – this is a partnership with a safe country that cares deeply about refugees, and currently hosts over 130,000 asylum seekers.”Both the Court of Appeal and the High Court found that the principle of relocating individuals to safe third countries to have their asylum claims processed is consistent with the UK’s obligations under the Refugee Convention. The Supreme Court did not disturb this.”Last week, the Home Office said it is committed to preventing small boats crossing the English Channel from France.”Our priority is to stop the boats, which is why we have taken robust action to crack down on vile people-smuggling gangs, deter migrants from making dangerous crossings and, alongside our French counterparts, intercept vessels,” a spokesperson said.Related TopicsRefugees and asylum seekersUnited NationsMore on this storyHow many people cross the Channel in small boats?Published2 days agoWhat does the PM’s promise to stop the boats mean?Published4 January 2023PM refuses to comment on future of asylum centrePublished6 days agoWhat is the UK’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda?Published2 days ago

-->